Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler has once again reiterated his commitment to the agency's ongoing regulation-by-enforcement strategy concerning cryptocurrency. Despite criticism from various sectors of the digital asset industry, Gensler maintains that the SEC’s efforts are firmly grounded in decades of legal precedent, and he intends to continue this approach to provide clarity and protection in the rapidly evolving world of digital assets.

SEC’s Regulatory Stance: A Decades-Old Foundation

In a recent interview with Bloomberg, Gensler defended the SEC’s current enforcement efforts, underscoring that the agency’s actions are not arbitrary but rather based on long-established laws dating back nearly a century. He emphasized that the SEC’s role is to protect investors, promote fair and transparent markets, and foster capital formation—all of which, according to him, are achievable under the existing regulatory framework.

“We have benefited from nine decades of robust laws from Congress and rules from various agencies, not just the SEC but the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, to help promote the markets, protect investors, and promote capital formation,” Gensler explained.

At the heart of this strategy is the application of time-tested legal principles, such as the Howey Test, which determines whether certain digital assets qualify as securities. Gensler argues that these rules have successfully governed financial markets for generations and should, with appropriate adaptation, be equally effective in regulating cryptocurrencies.

The Criticisms: Is Regulation-by-Enforcement Enough?

However, not everyone in the crypto industry or regulatory landscape agrees with Gensler’s approach. Critics argue that relying on enforcement actions under old laws designed for traditional financial markets is inadequate for dealing with the unique challenges posed by decentralized technologies and digital assets.

The recent court ruling in the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs, involving the sale of XRP tokens, highlights these concerns. A federal judge ruled that XRP sold to retail investors did not constitute a securities transaction, which undermined one of the SEC’s key enforcement strategies. This ruling called into question the applicability of the Howey Test to modern blockchain-based assets and exposed the gaps in applying decades-old securities law to new technologies.

While the SEC has continued to bring cases against crypto companies and projects, many of these enforcement efforts have met resistance, with several high-profile legal battles still unresolved. Detractors argue that a clearer, more tailored regulatory framework specifically designed for digital assets would foster innovation and provide much-needed guidance to market participants.

Crypto Remains a Key Focus in 2025 Examination Priorities

Despite the growing debate, Gensler’s SEC is not relenting in its scrutiny of the crypto space. The SEC’s Division of Examinations has just released its FY 2025 priorities, and crypto assets feature prominently once again. This year’s examination list provides more specificity than in previous years, explicitly naming Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange-traded products (ETPs) as focal points for scrutiny. This shift signals a growing interest in the regulation of products and services tied to the most established digital assets, particularly as they become more integrated into traditional financial markets.

The 2025 examination priorities represent the SEC’s continued focus on the potential risks that crypto assets pose to investors and the broader market. The agency plans to closely monitor how these products are marketed, sold, and managed, ensuring compliance with securities laws and safeguarding investor interests.

Key Takeaways for Market Participants

The SEC’s continued reliance on enforcement rather than preemptive rulemaking means that firms operating in the crypto space must stay vigilant. Companies involved with digital assets—whether through trading, custody, or offering products like Bitcoin ETPs—should expect heightened scrutiny and prepare for potential enforcement actions.

Firms should focus on the following areas to mitigate regulatory risk:

1. Compliance with Securities Laws: Ensure that any digital asset products or services offered comply with existing securities regulations, particularly when targeting retail investors.

2. Enhanced Disclosures: Provide clear, accurate, and thorough disclosures regarding the nature of digital assets, risks, and potential conflicts of interest to avoid falling afoul of the SEC’s focus on transparency.

3. Proactive Engagement with Regulators: As the SEC continues to add more specificity to its examination priorities, firms should proactively engage with regulators to stay ahead of potential enforcement actions.

Conclusion: Preparing for Continued Scrutiny

Gary Gensler’s reaffirmation of the SEC’s regulation-by-enforcement strategy for crypto underscores the agency’s commitment to maintaining control over a burgeoning industry that operates at the intersection of finance and technology. While the SEC’s approach has drawn criticism for being too rigid and out of step with technological innovation, it appears that Gensler and the SEC will continue down this path, relying on a body of laws that have stood the test of time in traditional financial markets.

As we move into 2025, companies involved with digital assets must ensure their operations align with existing securities laws while keeping an eye on potential regulatory developments. Anderson P.C. is here to help firms navigate this uncertain terrain, providing expert guidance on compliance, enforcement defense, and proactive strategies to stay ahead of regulatory scrutiny.

For more information on how Anderson P.C. can support your compliance efforts, contact us today.

* * *

Attorney Advertising—Anderson P.C. is a U.S. law firm and provides this information as a service to clients, prospective clients, and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship.

Anderson P.C. is a boutique law firm dedicated to defending clients in government investigations and securities enforcement actions initiated by the SEC, FINRA, DOJ, and other regulatory bodies. We provide focused, strategic counsel and regulatory guidance across the full spectrum of federal laws and regulations affecting broker-dealers, investment advisers, banks, asset managers, private funds, public companies, senior executives, and digital assets. Our deep expertise allows us to navigate complex legal challenges and deliver results-driven solutions tailored to our clients' unique needs.

If you have any questions or need legal assistance related to government investigations, securities enforcement actions, or regulatory compliance, please don't hesitate to contact us. Our team at Anderson P.C. is here to provide the expert guidance and support you need to navigate these complex challenges.