The recent vacating of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Private Fund Adviser Rules (PFAR) by the Fifth Circuit Court has sent ripples through the private equity (PE) industry. What was initially viewed as a burdensome regulatory overhaul for PE firms is now seen as a moment of reprieve, but also a pivotal point that raises larger questions about the future of SEC oversight. While many private equity firms are breathing a sigh of relief, this regulatory pause is unlikely to signal the end of increased scrutiny from the SEC. In fact, firms may need to prepare for a more nuanced and evolving approach to compliance in the wake of PFAR’s collapse.

A Moment of Relief, But Not Respite

When PFAR was first introduced, it represented a significant tightening of the SEC’s grip on private equity funds, particularly around reporting requirements. PE firms found themselves scrambling to allocate the necessary resources and budgets to comply with new rules. The challenge wasn’t just financial—it was also operational, as finance and compliance teams had to collaborate in ways they hadn't before, and many struggled to keep up with the SEC's heightened demands.

The court’s decision to vacate PFAR has undoubtedly offered a temporary reprieve. However, it is unlikely to stem the tide of regulatory enforcement altogether. The SEC still has an arsenal of tools at its disposal, and it continues to deploy them through examinations and enforcement actions targeting the most pressing issues for managers today, from NAV loans to the use of AI to bolster operations.

For PE firms, this means one thing: the regulatory landscape is shifting, but it is far from relaxing. While the SEC’s broader rulemaking efforts may be slowed, its examiners remain active, and their focus has expanded beyond traditional areas to include more dynamic and emerging challenges that firms are increasingly facing.

The Evolving Role of Transparency in Private Equity

Although PFAR’s requirements are no longer legally binding, its underlying principles—greater transparency and investor protections—have not disappeared. Investors, emboldened by the prospect of having a larger seat at the table under PFAR, are now demanding more comprehensive reporting from PE firms. As a result, many firms are voluntarily implementing reporting practices similar to what PFAR would have required, particularly in relation to quarterly updates and detailed disclosures.

The lesson for PE firms here is clear: investor expectations are changing, and even without PFAR, there is increasing pressure to meet these demands. This means allocating more resources to compliance and finance teams to ensure that they can deliver the transparency investors expect. The days when compliance was a back-office function primarily handled by legal and compliance teams are over. Now, finance departments are playing a critical role in ensuring that fees, expenses, and disclosures are properly categorized and reported.

NAV Loans: The Next Regulatory Battleground?

One area that has quickly emerged as a potential friction point between PE firms and the SEC is the use of NAV (net asset value) loans. As these loans become more prevalent within the industry, the SEC is beginning to focus on how they are utilized and disclosed. Examiners are asking probing questions, particularly around whether firms are using NAV loans to inflate their management fee base. They want to know if the NAV loan has increased invested capital and, consequently, management fees—and whether this practice has been properly disclosed to investors.

The issue of transparency is front and center. Are limited partners (LPs) fully aware of the use of NAV loans? Is this information explicitly outlined in fund documents? In many cases, the answer is no, and this is raising red flags for examiners. Firms that fail to clearly disclose these transactions are likely to come under greater scrutiny in future examinations.

Another area of concern is the involvement of affiliated service providers in these transactions. Examiners are keen to determine if affiliates are benefiting from these arrangements, whether through fees or other financial advantages. Firms need to ensure that their disclosures around conflicts of interest are robust and align with actual practices.

SEC Focus Areas: Fee Calculations, Affiliated Providers, and Investment Diligence

While NAV loans are one emerging battleground, the SEC's recent actions indicate that examiners are also deeply focused on several other key areas, including the calculation of management fees, the use of affiliated service providers, and investment diligence.

Management fees, in particular, are under intense scrutiny. Examiners want to ensure that PE firms are calculating fees accurately, particularly when it comes to impaired assets. If an investment is unlikely to recover its value, should it remain in the management fee base? Firms must have clear processes in place for evaluating the status of these investments and documenting their decisions. This is not just a question of accounting—it's a question of transparency and fairness to investors.

The use of affiliated service providers is another area where examiners are digging in. While many PE firms rely on vertically integrated service providers to deliver operational efficiencies, this practice is viewed as high-risk by the SEC due to potential conflicts of interest. Firms need to demonstrate that they have policies and procedures in place to monitor these relationships and that the fees charged are fair and properly disclosed to investors.

Lastly, investment diligence is becoming a critical focus for examiners, particularly in light of the fast-paced capital deployment that has characterized the private equity space in recent years. Examiners are looking at how firms scrutinize financial statements, whether they use third-party specialists, and how they handle red flags identified during the due diligence process. Firms must be prepared to show that they are conducting thorough and documented diligence, especially in cases where potential risks have been flagged.

What’s Next for the SEC and Private Equity?

The SEC’s regulatory agenda is far from empty, even as firms brace for the possibility of a shift in regulatory focus depending on the outcome of the upcoming presidential election. Custody rules, outsourced service providers, and the use of predictive analytics are all potential areas where new rulemaking could have a significant impact on private equity. While some of these issues may take longer to materialize, PE firms should stay attuned to developments and prepare accordingly.

In the short term, the SEC will likely continue to push forward with its examination and enforcement efforts, even as broader rulemaking efforts slow down. The agency is working against the clock, with fiscal year-end approaching and an election year creating additional uncertainty. This means that firms should expect a continued focus on high-impact examinations, with examiners zeroing in on current issues such as fee calculations, cybersecurity, and the use of affiliates.

Preparing for the Future

As the regulatory landscape for private equity evolves, firms must remain proactive in managing compliance risks. PFAR may be off the table, but its legacy endures in the form of heightened investor expectations and continued scrutiny from the SEC. PE firms should be prepared to meet these challenges head-on, by bolstering their compliance teams, enhancing transparency in their operations, and staying ahead of potential regulatory developments.

By taking these steps, private equity firms can navigate the post-PFAR world with confidence, ensuring that they are well-positioned to thrive in an increasingly complex regulatory environment.

* * *

Attorney Advertising—Anderson P.C. is a U.S. law firm and provides this information as a service to clients, prospective clients, and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship.

Anderson P.C. is a boutique law firm dedicated to defending clients in government investigations and securities enforcement actions initiated by the SEC, FINRA, DOJ, and other regulatory bodies. We provide focused, strategic counsel and regulatory guidance across the full spectrum of federal laws and regulations affecting broker-dealers, investment advisers, banks, asset managers, private funds, public companies, senior executives, and digital assets. Our deep expertise allows us to navigate complex legal challenges and deliver results-driven solutions tailored to our clients' unique needs.

If you have any questions or need legal assistance related to government investigations, securities enforcement actions, or regulatory compliance, please don't hesitate to contact us. Our team at Anderson P.C. is here to provide the expert guidance and support you need to navigate these complex challenges.