Sen. Lummis Urges Second Circuit to Curb SEC’s Crypto Overreach
Senator Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., has thrown her support behind Coinbase Inc. in its legal battle against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), urging the Second Circuit to clarify the limits of the SEC’s authority in regulating digital assets. In an amicus brief filed Friday, Lummis argued that the SEC’s enforcement actions against crypto intermediaries, including Coinbase, undermine congressional efforts to establish a clear regulatory framework for the digital asset industry.
The Case Against Coinbase
The SEC’s lawsuit against Coinbase alleges that the company operated as an unregistered securities exchange, broker, and clearing agency, claiming that secondary sales of digital assets on the platform violate securities laws. U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla allowed these claims to proceed but granted Coinbase’s request for an interlocutory appeal, enabling the case to go before the Second Circuit for review.
Coinbase’s central argument, as outlined in its brief to the appeals court, is that the SEC’s approach to regulating digital assets through enforcement actions rather than clear rulemaking has created uncertainty and stymied innovation. The company contends there is “no more pressing issue in securities law today” than determining the SEC’s regulatory reach over digital assets.
Lummis’ Arguments
1. SEC’s Overreach Conflicts with Congressional Intent
Senator Lummis, the chair of the Senate Banking Committee's crypto subcommittee, contends that the SEC’s “legislation-by-enforcement” strategy improperly treats nearly all digital assets as securities. She emphasized that this approach contradicts Congress’s ongoing efforts to craft a tailored regulatory framework for the digital asset sector.
“The SEC’s ill-advised attempt to vastly expand its regulatory ambit over digital assets runs counter to congressional efforts to develop a thoughtful framework for digital asset activity and risks stymying innovation in this revolutionary field,” Lummis wrote in her brief.
2. The Howey Test Needs Clarification
Lummis called on the court to provide clarity on how the decades-old Howey test, which defines what constitutes an investment contract, applies to digital assets. The senator argued that the current framework is ill-suited to the complexities of the digital asset market and that a nuanced approach is necessary to foster innovation while ensuring investor protection.
3. Protecting U.S. Innovation and Leadership in Crypto
The senator highlighted the need to protect the United States’ position as a global leader in the digital asset space. She warned that the SEC’s aggressive enforcement strategy could drive innovation and investment offshore, harming the domestic economy.
The Legislative Context
Lummis has been a vocal advocate for comprehensive crypto regulation. She co-authored a bipartisan bill with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., that seeks to create a clear legal framework for digital assets, balancing innovation with consumer protection. The ongoing legislative efforts reflect Congress’s recognition of the need for tailored rules to govern the evolving crypto industry.
However, Lummis argues that the SEC’s current actions threaten to derail these efforts. By treating nearly all digital assets as securities, the agency is preempting Congress’s role in shaping policy for the sector.
Looking Ahead
Why This Case Matters
The Second Circuit’s decision could set a precedent that shapes the future of crypto regulation in the United States. A ruling that limits the SEC’s authority could compel the agency to adopt a more measured approach and prompt Congress to accelerate its legislative efforts.
Impact on Crypto Businesses
The outcome of this case will have significant implications for crypto platforms, developers, and investors. A clear ruling could provide much-needed guidance on compliance obligations and reduce the legal uncertainty that has plagued the industry.
Conclusion
The SEC’s lawsuit against Coinbase has become a pivotal battle in the broader struggle over how digital assets are regulated in the United States. Senator Lummis’s intervention underscores the high stakes of the case, not just for Coinbase but for the future of the crypto industry as a whole.
As regulatory battles continue to unfold, Anderson P.C. remains committed to helping clients navigate the complex and evolving landscape of digital asset regulation. For insights and guidance, visit our website.
Case Reference: SEC v. Coinbase Inc. et al., case number 25-145, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
* * *
Attorney Advertising—Anderson P.C. is a U.S. law firm and provides this information as a service to clients, prospective clients, and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship.
Anderson P.C. is a boutique law firm dedicated to defending clients in government investigations and securities enforcement actions initiated by the SEC, FINRA, DOJ, and other regulatory bodies. We provide focused, strategic counsel and regulatory guidance across the full spectrum of federal laws and regulations affecting broker-dealers, investment advisers, banks, asset managers, private funds, public companies, senior executives, and digital assets. Our deep expertise allows us to navigate complex legal challenges and deliver results-driven solutions tailored to our clients' unique needs.
If you have any questions or need legal assistance related to government investigations, securities enforcement actions, or regulatory compliance, please don't hesitate to contact us. Our team at Anderson P.C. is here to provide the expert guidance and support you need to navigate these complex challenges.
