Insights & Regulatory Updates

Update: The Supreme Court’s Decision in SEC v. Jarkesy and Its Broader Impact on SEC Enforcement
SEC Regulatory Update K. Braeden Anderson SEC Regulatory Update K. Braeden Anderson

Update: The Supreme Court’s Decision in SEC v. Jarkesy and Its Broader Impact on SEC Enforcement

The Jarkesy ruling has considerable consequences for the SEC’s enforcement program. For years, the SEC has utilized its administrative forum to pursue civil penalties for securities fraud, with the flexibility to adjudicate matters in-house. However, the Supreme Court's decision effectively eliminates this option for cases seeking civil penalties. As a result, the SEC will likely need to shift more cases to federal court, where defendants are entitled to a jury trial. This shift could increase the complexity, time, and costs associated with SEC enforcement actions.

Read More
FINRA Prevails in Broker’s Post-Jarkesy Challenge to Disciplinary Hearing
FINRA Litigation K. Braeden Anderson FINRA Litigation K. Braeden Anderson

FINRA Prevails in Broker’s Post-Jarkesy Challenge to Disciplinary Hearing

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently scored a legal victory after a federal judge in Philadelphia dismissed a broker’s challenge to a FINRA disciplinary proceeding, which was based on the U.S. Supreme Court’s Jarkesy decision. This decision provides some relief for both FINRA and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as they face increased scrutiny following the Supreme Court's ruling on administrative law judges.

Read More