Independent and Internal Investigations

At Anderson P.C., we are known for our swift, thorough, and discreet handling of internal and independent investigations. Led by Braeden Anderson, our firm specializes in navigating the most complex corporate issues, including executive-level misconduct, corporate governance concerns, and regulatory compliance failures. We understand the urgency and sensitivity of these matters, particularly when reputational risk and potential legal exposure are at stake.

Our approach prioritizes independence, integrity, and clear communication with stakeholders such as boards of directors, audit committees, and special committees. Whether the goal is to uncover internal fraud or to respond to external allegations, Anderson P.C. is the first call for companies seeking to resolve matters efficiently and effectively.

Investigations that Mitigate Risk

At Anderson P.C., our investigations are strategically designed to not only uncover the truth but also to minimize a company’s exposure to regulatory action, legal liability, and public scrutiny. Braeden Anderson has a proven track record of conducting investigations that help clients avoid full-scale government investigations, reducing the risk of penalties and litigation.

Our experience spans a wide array of corporate issues, including:

  • Corporate governance and compliance failures

  • Executive-level fraud and misconduct

  • Financial reporting and disclosure issues

  • Anti-bribery and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) compliance

  • Insider trading and securities fraud

  • AML/KYC protocols and violations

Crisis Management and Strategic Response

In fast-moving situations, Anderson P.C. is adept at managing crises that could lead to negative publicity, government investigations, or regulatory action. Braeden Anderson's expertise in navigating legal and business crises ensures that companies can maintain their reputations while addressing legal risks. Our firm develops and executes strategies that protect the company’s stakeholders, balancing legal considerations with business and financial implications.

Expertise in Corporate Investigations

Our firm is frequently retained to conduct independent investigations on behalf of boards of directors, audit committees, and special litigation committees. We help guide these committees through shareholder demands, ensuring that investigations are thorough, objective, and presented with a view to resolving potential legal challenges.

Strategic Communication and Regulatory Defense

Regardless of the findings, Anderson P.C. is skilled at communicating the results of investigations in a manner that protects the company’s reputation, mitigates risk, and minimizes business disruption. We work closely with our clients to develop strategies that address regulatory fallout and, when necessary, provide a robust defense in shareholder or government actions.

Whether you are facing an internal corporate issue or an external investigation, Anderson P.C. is equipped to guide you through every stage with precision and discretion. Contact us to learn more about how we can help protect your company’s interests.

Featured
SEC Charges “Magic Mushroom” Company and Two Individuals in $8 Million Pump-and-Dump
SEC Charges “Magic Mushroom” Company and Two Individuals in $8 Million Pump-and-Dump

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed charges against Minerco Inc. (former over-the-counter ticker: MINE) and two individuals—Bobby Shumake Japhia and Julius Makiri Jenge—in connection with an alleged multimillion-dollar pump-and-dump scheme that defrauded investors out of approximately $8 million. The SEC's complaint alleges that the defendants generated millions of dollars in illicit profits by manipulating the market for Minerco’s stock through deceptive tactics and false promotions.

DOJ Takes Aim at Visa’s Dominance in Debit Card Market: Antitrust Lawsuit Alleges Anti-Competitive Tactics
DOJ Takes Aim at Visa’s Dominance in Debit Card Market: Antitrust Lawsuit Alleges Anti-Competitive Tactics

The U.S. Department of Justice has launched an antitrust lawsuit against Visa, accusing the payments giant of exploiting its dominance in the debit card market to stifle competition and impose exorbitant fees on consumers and businesses. The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, claims that Visa uses its market power to pressure merchants, banks, and financial institutions into using its proprietary payment processing network, resulting in billions of dollars in fees that are ultimately passed on to consumers.

SEC Targets Misleading AI Claims: Enforcement Actions and Key Takeaways
SEC Targets Misleading AI Claims: Enforcement Actions and Key Takeaways

Explore the SEC's recent enforcement actions targeting "AI washing"—the practice of overstating or misrepresenting the use of artificial intelligence. Learn about key cases, regulatory risks, and compliance strategies for firms leveraging AI technology.

Update: The Supreme Court’s Decision in SEC v. Jarkesy and Its Broader Impact on SEC Enforcement
Update: The Supreme Court’s Decision in SEC v. Jarkesy and Its Broader Impact on SEC Enforcement

The Jarkesy ruling has considerable consequences for the SEC’s enforcement program. For years, the SEC has utilized its administrative forum to pursue civil penalties for securities fraud, with the flexibility to adjudicate matters in-house. However, the Supreme Court's decision effectively eliminates this option for cases seeking civil penalties. As a result, the SEC will likely need to shift more cases to federal court, where defendants are entitled to a jury trial. This shift could increase the complexity, time, and costs associated with SEC enforcement actions.

SEC Charges Former Executives of Medly Health Inc. with Investor Fraud
SEC Charges Former Executives of Medly Health Inc. with Investor Fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently charged three former executives of the now-defunct digital pharmacy startup Medly Health Inc. with defrauding investors in a scheme that raised over $170 million. The charges underscore the SEC’s continued focus on corporate malfeasance, particularly within startups seeking capital from investors.