A Quick Guide on AI in Corporate Compliance in 2025

As we step into 2025, artificial intelligence (AI) continues to redefine corporate landscapes, becoming both an asset and a focal point for regulatory scrutiny. In September 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a significant shift in its Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (ECCP), highlighting the risks associated with AI technologies. For organizations, this move underscores an urgent need to integrate AI risk management into their compliance frameworks.

The DOJ’s Updated Compliance Guidance

The DOJ's revised ECCP now requires businesses to address how they identify, monitor, and mitigate risks tied to their use of AI. Federal prosecutors are tasked with assessing a company’s compliance program by examining:

  • AI Risk Assessment: How thoroughly does the organization identify risks linked to its AI systems, including bias, misuse, or operational failures?

  • Testing and Monitoring: Are AI systems regularly tested to ensure they function as intended and adhere to company policies and applicable laws?

  • Resource Allocation: Is there a balance between resources allocated to innovation and those supporting compliance and risk management?

  • Accountability Measures: How does the company manage unintended consequences, such as faulty AI-generated decisions or outputs?

Companies must demonstrate not only that their AI systems are beneficial but also that they are compliant with legal standards and integrated into broader risk management efforts.

Preparing Your Organization for 2025

With these updated guidelines, organizations should take a proactive approach to bolster their compliance efforts. Below are key actions to consider:

1. Comprehensive Risk Assessments

  • Identify where and how AI is used across your organization.

  • Map potential vulnerabilities, from data bias to operational errors.

  • Incorporate these risks into your enterprise risk management strategy.

2. Regular Testing and Oversight

  • Develop protocols for ongoing monitoring of AI tools to ensure consistent functionality and compliance.

  • Employ human oversight to address gaps in performance or unintended outputs.

3. Policy and Procedure Updates

  • Revise internal compliance policies to reflect AI-related risks and responsibilities.

  • Establish clear guidelines for employee interaction with AI systems, ensuring proper use and reporting mechanisms.

4. Resource Allocation and Training

  • Allocate resources equitably across departments, ensuring compliance teams have adequate technology and support.

  • Train employees on the ethical use of AI, highlighting specific risks and compliance protocols.

5. Collaboration and Industry Benchmarking

  • Review best practices among industry peers to stay informed of emerging risks and mitigation strategies.

  • Establish partnerships with legal and AI experts to ensure robust compliance frameworks.

Emerging Trends in AI Compliance for 2025

State-Level Regulations on the Rise

While federal AI regulation remains fragmented, states have taken the lead. At least 33 states formed AI committees or task forces in 2024, with several expected to introduce legislation in 2025. The patchwork of state laws will likely focus on deepfake bans, transparency measures, and risk-based governance frameworks. Companies operating in multiple jurisdictions should prepare for compliance with varying state requirements.

Increased AI Use in Legal and Corporate Workflows

Legal AI tools are becoming increasingly sophisticated, with capabilities extending from document review to predictive analytics. However, this growth is paired with heightened scrutiny. Organizations must demonstrate that their AI systems meet ethical and operational standards to maintain trust with regulators and stakeholders.

Focus on Ethical AI Practices

The DOJ’s emphasis on resource allocation for compliance signals a growing expectation that organizations must invest in ethical AI practices. This includes mitigating biases, ensuring transparency, and safeguarding data privacy.

2025: Challenges and Opportunities

The DOJ's updated ECCP reflects broader trends in regulatory oversight and corporate responsibility. While these changes present challenges, they also offer opportunities for organizations to distinguish themselves as leaders in ethical and innovative AI deployment.

To stay ahead, businesses must adopt a forward-thinking approach, leveraging AI to enhance operations while safeguarding against risks. By aligning compliance efforts with DOJ expectations, organizations can navigate the evolving regulatory landscape and establish a competitive advantage.

At Anderson P.C., we specialize in helping companies integrate AI compliance into their broader corporate governance strategies. Whether you’re refining your risk management systems or preparing for a DOJ evaluation, our team is here to guide you through the complexities of AI regulation.

* * *

Attorney Advertising—Anderson P.C. is a U.S. law firm and provides this information as a service to clients, prospective clients, and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship.

Anderson P.C. is a boutique law firm dedicated to defending clients in government investigations and securities enforcement actions initiated by the SEC, FINRA, DOJ, and other regulatory bodies. We provide focused, strategic counsel and regulatory guidance across the full spectrum of federal laws and regulations affecting broker-dealers, investment advisers, banks, asset managers, private funds, public companies, senior executives, and digital assets. Our deep expertise allows us to navigate complex legal challenges and deliver results-driven solutions tailored to our clients' unique needs.

If you have any questions or need legal assistance related to government investigations, securities enforcement actions, or regulatory compliance, please don't hesitate to contact us. Our team at Anderson P.C. is here to provide the expert guidance and support you need to navigate these complex challenges.

Previous
Previous

Anderson’s Guide to Effective Independent Internal Investigations

Next
Next

The Supreme Court in 2025: A Conservative Court in a Changing America