Insights & Regulatory Updates

Why Startups Should Consider Fractional General Counsel Services
Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson

Why Startups Should Consider Fractional General Counsel Services

At Anderson P.C., we’re thrilled to announce that we now offer this innovative legal solution to startups. Our fractional GC services are designed to help founders focus on what they do best—building their business—while we handle the legal complexities. If you’re interested in learning more about how fractional General Counsel services can benefit your startup, contact us today.

Read More
The Evergreen Importance of Special Committees in Corporate Governance
Anderson Practical Guide K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Practical Guide K. Braeden Anderson

The Evergreen Importance of Special Committees in Corporate Governance

Special committees have long been a cornerstone of corporate governance, particularly in situations involving conflicts of interest, significant transactions, or internal investigations. Their relevance persists, not just as a response to crises, but as a proactive measure to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability in decision-making. As corporate transactions become more complex and scrutiny intensifies, the role of special committees remains indispensable.

Read More
Drafting Effective Board Resolutions: How to Appoint a Special Committee for Internal Investigations
Anderson Practical Guide K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Practical Guide K. Braeden Anderson

Drafting Effective Board Resolutions: How to Appoint a Special Committee for Internal Investigations

In moments of crisis, such as allegations of misconduct or conflicts of interest, a company's board of directors must act decisively and transparently. One powerful tool at its disposal is the creation of a special committee to oversee internal investigations. This article explores the mechanics of drafting board resolutions to appoint such committees, leveraging insights and best practices from Anderson P.C., a boutique securities law firm specializing in governance and regulatory matters.

Read More
A Quick Guide on AI in Corporate Compliance in 2025
Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson

A Quick Guide on AI in Corporate Compliance in 2025

As we step into 2025, artificial intelligence (AI) continues to redefine corporate landscapes, becoming both an asset and a focal point for regulatory scrutiny. In September 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a significant shift in its Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (ECCP), highlighting the risks associated with AI technologies. For organizations, this move underscores an urgent need to integrate AI risk management into their compliance frameworks.

Read More
Strengthening Whistleblower Protections: SEC Enforcement and Key Actions for Companies
SEC Regulatory Update K. Braeden Anderson SEC Regulatory Update K. Braeden Anderson

Strengthening Whistleblower Protections: SEC Enforcement and Key Actions for Companies

On September 9, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced settlements with seven public companies for violations of whistleblower protections under Rule 21F-17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This latest enforcement action underscores the SEC's growing commitment to ensuring whistleblowers can report potential securities violations without fear of retaliation or obstruction. Companies are now called to reassess their policies to comply with these important protections.

Read More
SEC's Push for Sanctions Against Elon Musk: Implications for Corporate Governance
SEC Litigation Update K. Braeden Anderson SEC Litigation Update K. Braeden Anderson

SEC's Push for Sanctions Against Elon Musk: Implications for Corporate Governance

On September 20, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced its intention to seek sanctions against Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX and owner of X (formerly Twitter). This move comes in light of Musk’s failure to comply with a court order to testify regarding his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter. The implications of this case extend beyond Musk himself, raising significant questions about corporate governance, transparency, and the responsibilities of high-profile executives.

Read More