SEC Crackdown on Texting Violations: Asset Managers and Rating Agencies Brace for Next Round of Fines

The SEC’s relentless pursuit of record-keeping violations has reached new heights, as asset managers and rating agencies find themselves in the crosshairs of the regulator’s expanding probe into the use of personal devices for business communications. The investigation, which began in 2021 with a focus on investment bankers, has already resulted in over $2 billion in civil penalties from Wall Street firms. With recent settlements amounting to nearly $400 million from multiple firms, the SEC shows no signs of slowing down.

This ongoing scrutiny has led to significant apprehension within the asset management industry. Many firms have disclosed their involvement in the SEC’s texting probe, with some setting aside tens of millions of dollars in anticipation of forthcoming fines. The concern stems not only from the financial impact of these penalties but also from the broader implications of the SEC’s aggressive enforcement approach.

Under the leadership of Chair Gary Gensler, the SEC has adopted a more assertive stance, pursuing what some industry experts describe as “creative theories of enforcement.” This has sparked debate among industry advocates, who argue that the regulator may be overstepping its bounds by expanding the scope of its investigations beyond traditional areas of concern.

Ken Fang, Associate General Counsel at the Investment Company Institute, expressed these concerns, noting that the SEC’s actions may exceed what is actually required by law. Despite this, many firms are opting to settle rather than risk prolonged litigation, viewing the penalties as an inevitable cost of doing business in a highly regulated environment.

The SEC’s focus on record-keeping is rooted in its belief that poor documentation could undermine future investigations, potentially harming investors. This stance was reiterated in the regulator’s recent statement accompanying the latest round of settlements.

As the probe continues, the asset management and ratings industries must remain vigilant, balancing the need for compliance with the challenges posed by an increasingly complex regulatory landscape. The SEC’s actions serve as a stark reminder of the importance of maintaining robust internal controls and ensuring that all business communications are properly documented, regardless of the medium used.

As the SEC's investigation intensifies, it's more important than ever for regulated entities to ensure their compliance protocols are airtight. If you have concerns or need guidance navigating this complex regulatory environment, please contact us. Our team is here to help you assess your current practices, address potential vulnerabilities, and develop strategies to mitigate risks.

* * *

Attorney Advertising—Anderson P.C. is a U.S. law firm located at 1717 K Street NW, Suite 900, Washington, D.C. 20006.

Anderson P.C. provides this information as a service to clients, prospective clients, and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking advice from professional advisers. If you have any questions, please contact Braeden Anderson.

Previous
Previous

Key Takeaways from SEC Report on Cyber-Related Frauds and Internal Accounting Controls

Next
Next

Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy: Implications for SEC Enforcement and Administrative Adjudication